Author: majestylegal

Income Tax

No Presumption of International Transactions without Fulfilling Section 92F ITA,1961 Conditions- Delhi HC

Transfer Pricing-ITA, 1961

NI Act

Vicarious Liability Of Non-Executive Directors Under NI Act- SC

NI Act,1881 (3)

Uncategorized

BAIL U/S 37 NDPS ACT CAN BE RELAXED WHEN RECOVERY IS MARGINALLY ABOVE COMMERCIAL QUANTITY- P&H HC

Bar under section 37 NDPS act can be relaxed when recovery is marginally above commerical quantity

Judgement

ONLINE TRADEMARK VIOLATION COSTS AMAZON Rs. 339.25 Cr AS DELHI HC ISSUES LANDMARK RULING

TRADEMARK VIOLATION COSTS AMAZON HEFTY PENALTIES

Uncategorized

Invocation of Section 21(5) of the Act requires proof of willfull suppression- AP High Court

Section 21(5) of AP VAT Act,2005 (1)

Criminal Case, CrPC

DELHI HIGH COURT REAFFIRMS MAGISTRATE’S LIMITED POWER UNDER SECTION 156(3) CRPC

Del HC reaffirms Magistrate’s Power under CrPC

Criminal Law, Judgement, PMLA

SUPREME COURT STRONGLY CRITICIZES ED FOR MISUSING PMLA TO PROLONG ACCUSED’S DETENTION

PMLA-SC judgement

Companies Act, Judgement, Natural Justice

Delhi HC upholds NFRA’S Authority; quashes disciplinary actions.

Deloitte_Vs_UoI

Law, Taxation

STEP FORWARD! We represented this matter wherein Hon’ble Court acknowledged critical legal issues: whether demand can stand without a defined methodology under the Excise Act and whether penalty under Rule 26(1) was justified. Further scheduled for final hearing

Rathi excise appeal (1)

Income Tax, Law, Tax

CBDT’S APPROVAL MUST BE EXPLICITLY MADE BY THE BOARD OR ITS AUTHORIZED MEMBERS- Bombay HC

SECTION 119(2)(B) OF ITA,1961