Skip to content
Majesty Legal
  • Home
  • Blog & Articles
  • Practice Area
    • Taxation Law – Direct & Indirect
    • Economic Offences/Anti-Money Laundering Law
    • Corporate, Insolvency, Competition/Anti-trust and Security Law
    • Commercial/Contractual Law & Mining Law
    • Service Law and Labour Law
    • Alternative Dispute Redressal (ADR) – Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation
    • Consumer, Insurance and Motor Vehicle Accident Claim (MACT) Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Matrimonial, Family and Inheritance Law
    • Pro Bono and Social Cause
    • Land, Revenue, and Real Estate Law
  • About
  • Contact

Category: Companies Act

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Companies Act
Companies Act, Judgement, Natural Justice

Delhi HC upholds NFRA’S Authority; quashes disciplinary actions.

February 23, 2025majestylegalLeave a comment

Deloitte_Vs_UoI

Companies Act, Corporate Law, Legal Update, National Company Law Tribunal

NCLT has the power for revival of struck off company under section 252 of the Act, 2013

February 22, 2024majestylegalcompanies act, legal updateLeave a comment

COMPANIES ACT 2013

Companies Act, Corporate Law, Legal Update, Tax

NFRA proceedings stayed against CA for “professional misconduct”- Delhi High Court

January 27, 2024majestylegalChartered Accountant, NFRALeave a comment

CA Unnikrishan versus NFRA

Companies Act, Corporate Case, IBC, Judgement, Legal Update, National Company Law Tribunal

The Supreme Court ruling on whether the NCLAT has the authority to excuse delays beyond the stipulated 45 days.

December 19, 2023majestylegalLeave a comment

The-Supreme-Court-ruling-on-whether-the-NCLAT-has-the-authority-to-excuse-delays-beyond-the-stipulated-45-days_compressed

Article, Companies Act, Corporate Law, Tax, Taxation, Taxmann Publication

Taxpayers vs NFRA

September 18, 2023September 18, 2023majestylegalLeave a comment

Taxpayers vs NFRA

Recent Posts

  • DECEPTIVE IMITATION: COURT BLOCKS ROGUE WEBSITE FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT: Delhi HC
  • SC ASKS CBIC TO RELAX GST TIMELINES FOR BONAFIED ERRORS
  • REFUND CLAIM VALID AS NOTIFICATION CANNOT BE GIVEN RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT TO DENY ITC- Madras HC
  • GST DEMAND OF FOUR YEARS CONSOLIDATED NOTICE IS IMPERMISSIBLE: Bombay HC
  • Mere intimation of arrest insufficient; grounds must be clearly communicated- Gauhati High Court
EMAIL US majestylegal9@gmail.com,mahi@majestylegal.in
PHONE : +91 9785461395

OFFICE : B-87, UDB Alaknanda Apartment, G-1,Ganesh Marg/Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015


CHAMBER : 204, E-Block Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur

© 2021 Majesty Legal All right reserved

Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes

Free Consultation