Skip to content
Majesty Legal
  • Home
  • Blog & Articles
  • Practice Area
    • Taxation Law – Direct & Indirect
    • Economic Offences/Anti-Money Laundering Law
    • Corporate, Insolvency, Competition/Anti-trust and Security Law
    • Commercial/Contractual Law & Mining Law
    • Service Law and Labour Law
    • Alternative Dispute Redressal (ADR) – Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation
    • Consumer, Insurance and Motor Vehicle Accident Claim (MACT) Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Matrimonial, Family and Inheritance Law
    • Pro Bono and Social Cause
    • Land, Revenue, and Real Estate Law
  • About
  • Contact

Category: Customs Act

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Customs Act
Customs Act, Judgement, Legal Update

Declaration of dutiable goods under Customs Act, 1962 is mandatory- Kerala HC

June 12, 2024majestylegalCustoms Act, legal updateLeave a comment

Customs Act, 1962 (2)

Customs Act, Legal Update

Classification under Customs Act, no confiscation under section 111(m)- CESTAT Delhi

June 1, 2024majestylegalConfiscation of goods, Customs Act, legal updateLeave a comment

Customs Act, 1962

Customs Act, Indirect Tax, Judgement, Legal Update

Challenging constitutional validity of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, held invalid- SC

April 1, 2024majestylegalConstitutional validity, Customs Act, Section 129 E Customs Act, Supreme CourtLeave a comment

Section 129 E Customs Act, 1962

Customs Act, Indirect Tax, Judgement, Legal Update

GOODS OF IMPORT CONSIGNMENT COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS COMPARABLE GOODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF VALUE UNDER RULE 3 OF RULES 1963- SC

March 1, 2024majestylegalCustoms Act, indirect tax, legal updateLeave a comment

GOODS OF IMPORT CONSIGNMENT COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS COMPARABLE GOODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF VALUE UNDER RULE 3 OF RULES 1963- SC (1)

Customs Act, Judgement

IF DUTY DRAWBACK REMAINS UNPAID THREE MONTHS AFTER THE CLAIM IS SUBMITTED, THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED TO INTEREST AS WELL: SC

February 7, 2024majestylegalCustoms Act, Duty drawback, exports, interestLeave a comment

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. VERSUS M/S. B. T. PATIL AND SONS BELGAUM (CONSTRUCTION) PVT. LTD.

Customs Act, Legal Update

Release of seized goods as no notice served under section 110 (1) of Custom Acts, 1962- Delhi HC

January 19, 2024majestylegal1962, Section 110 (1) Custom Act, seizure of goodsLeave a comment

Ms Sym Company versus PR Commissioner Customs (imports)

Corporate Law, Customs Act, Judgement, Legal Update

Auction of confiscated goods are unconstitutional- Bombay HC

December 30, 2023majestylegalConfiscation of goldLeave a comment

Leyla Mohmoodi Vs. The Additional Commissioner of Customs

Central Excise Rules, Customs Act, Legal Update

Flue gas generated during manufacturing metallurgical coke is not marketable – CESTAT, Kolkata

August 17, 2023August 17, 2023majestylegalLeave a comment

LEGAL UPDATE 16.08

Customs Act, Legal Update, Taxation, Unjust Enrichment

NON APPLICABILITY OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN REFUND MATTERS

July 14, 2023majestylegalLeave a comment

LEGAL UPDATE 14.07.2023

Recent Posts

  • DECEPTIVE IMITATION: COURT BLOCKS ROGUE WEBSITE FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT: Delhi HC
  • SC ASKS CBIC TO RELAX GST TIMELINES FOR BONAFIED ERRORS
  • REFUND CLAIM VALID AS NOTIFICATION CANNOT BE GIVEN RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT TO DENY ITC- Madras HC
  • GST DEMAND OF FOUR YEARS CONSOLIDATED NOTICE IS IMPERMISSIBLE: Bombay HC
  • Mere intimation of arrest insufficient; grounds must be clearly communicated- Gauhati High Court
EMAIL US majestylegal9@gmail.com,mahi@majestylegal.in
PHONE : +91 9785461395

OFFICE : B-87, UDB Alaknanda Apartment, G-1,Ganesh Marg/Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015


CHAMBER : 204, E-Block Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur

© 2021 Majesty Legal All right reserved

Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes

Free Consultation