Skip to content
Majesty Legal
  • Home
  • Blog & Articles
  • Practice Area
    • Taxation Law – Direct & Indirect
    • Economic Offences/Anti-Money Laundering Law
    • Corporate, Insolvency, Competition/Anti-trust and Security Law
    • Commercial/Contractual Law & Mining Law
    • Service Law and Labour Law
    • Alternative Dispute Redressal (ADR) – Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation
    • Consumer, Insurance and Motor Vehicle Accident Claim (MACT) Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Matrimonial, Family and Inheritance Law
    • Pro Bono and Social Cause
    • Land, Revenue, and Real Estate Law
  • About
  • Contact

Category: Indirect Tax

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Indirect Tax
Customs Act, Indirect Tax, Judgement, Legal Update

Challenging constitutional validity of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, held invalid- SC

April 1, 2024majestylegalConstitutional validity, Customs Act, Section 129 E Customs Act, Supreme CourtLeave a comment

Section 129 E Customs Act, 1962

Customs Act, Indirect Tax, Judgement, Legal Update

GOODS OF IMPORT CONSIGNMENT COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS COMPARABLE GOODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF VALUE UNDER RULE 3 OF RULES 1963- SC

March 1, 2024majestylegalCustoms Act, indirect tax, legal updateLeave a comment

GOODS OF IMPORT CONSIGNMENT COULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS COMPARABLE GOODS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF VALUE UNDER RULE 3 OF RULES 1963- SC (1)

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update

REASSESSMENT NOTICES UNDER THE OLD REGIME, ARE TIME-BARRED- Cal HC

February 19, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, income tax, indirect tax, legal update, reassessmentLeave a comment

reaasessment notices under old regime

Indirect Tax, Legal Update, Service Tax

No service tax chargeable under security agency services- CESTAT Ahmedabad

February 18, 2024majestylegalCESTAT, indirect tax, legal update, service taxLeave a comment

CESTAT Ahemdabad

Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Judgement, Legal Update

POST AMENDMENT, MERE REASON TO BELIEVE NO GROUND TO CARRY REASSESSMENT

February 17, 2024majestylegalassessee, income tax, indirect tax, reassessmentLeave a comment

reassessment Karnataka HC judgement

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update, Service Tax

DEMAND MERELY ON BASIS OF FORM 26AS, NOT SUSTAINABLE

February 13, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, income tax, indirect tax, serivce taxLeave a comment

Demand on basis of Form 26AS not sustainable

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update

MERE CHANGE OF OPINION BY AO, NO GROUND FOR RE-OPENING ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING

February 9, 2024majestylegal#IncomeTax, bombay high court, indirect tax, ministry of financeLeave a comment

Emkay global v Assistant Commissioner of IT

Indirect Tax, Law, Legal Update, Limitation, Tax, Taxation

EXTENDED PERIOD OF LIMITATION WILL NOT APPLY IN ABSENCE OF DELIBERATE SUPPRESSION

July 11, 2023July 12, 2023majestylegalLeave a comment

EXTENDED PERIOD OF LIMITATION WILL NOT APPLY IN ABSENCE OF DELIBERATE SUPPRESSION

Recent Posts

  • AO CANNOT REEXAMINE NET PROFIT BEYOND SCOPE OF SECTION 115J: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
  • CASH CREDIT ACCOUNT NOT ‘PROPERTY’ FOR ATTACHMENT UNDER SECTION 83: BOMBAY HC
  • FOREIGN NATIONAL CANNOT BE RESTRICTED FOR INDIFINITE PERIOD BY ISSUING LOC EVEN WHEN NOT NAMED AS ACCUSED- Madras HC
  • ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT HOLDS ANTICIPATORY BAIL MAINTAINABLE UNDER BNSS EVEN IN NDPS CASES
  • ARBITRATION APPLICATION ALLOWED DESPITE ABSENCE OF SECTION 21 NOTICE- Rajasthan HC
EMAIL US majestylegal9@gmail.com,mahi@majestylegal.in
PHONE : +91 9785461395

OFFICE : B-87, UDB Alaknanda Apartment, G-1,Ganesh Marg/Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015


CHAMBER : 204, E-Block Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur

© 2021 Majesty Legal All right reserved

Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes

Free Consultation