Skip to content
Majesty Legal
  • Home
  • Blog & Articles
  • Practice Area
    • Taxation Law – Direct & Indirect
    • Economic Offences/Anti-Money Laundering Law
    • Corporate, Insolvency, Competition/Anti-trust and Security Law
    • Commercial/Contractual Law & Mining Law
    • Service Law and Labour Law
    • Alternative Dispute Redressal (ADR) – Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation
    • Consumer, Insurance and Motor Vehicle Accident Claim (MACT) Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Matrimonial, Family and Inheritance Law
    • Pro Bono and Social Cause
    • Land, Revenue, and Real Estate Law
  • About
  • Contact

Category: Corporate Law

  • Home
  • Blog
  • update
  • Corporate Law
Corporate Law, IBC, Legal Update

Show Cause Notice Without Supporting documents cannot be sustained under IBC, 2016- Del HC

May 30, 2024majestylegalCIRP, IBC, Show cause noticeLeave a comment

Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Corporate Law, Legal Update, NI Act

Pre-mature complaint under section 138 NI Act, 1881 is not maintainable- Karnataka HC

March 20, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, legal update, Negotiable InstrumentsLeave a comment

Section 138 NI Act, 1881

Corporate Law, Judgement, NI Act

Merely quoting section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 isn’t enough to hold a director responsible- SC

March 18, 2024majestylegallegal update, NI Act, Section 141, Supreme CourtLeave a comment

Section 141 NI Act, 1881

Companies Act, Corporate Law, Legal Update, National Company Law Tribunal

NCLT has the power for revival of struck off company under section 252 of the Act, 2013

February 22, 2024majestylegalcompanies act, legal updateLeave a comment

COMPANIES ACT 2013

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update

REASSESSMENT NOTICES UNDER THE OLD REGIME, ARE TIME-BARRED- Cal HC

February 19, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, income tax, indirect tax, legal update, reassessmentLeave a comment

reaasessment notices under old regime

Corporate Law, IBC, Legal Update

CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED IF NOT SUBMITTED UNDER THE PRESCRIBED FORM – SC

February 15, 2024majestylegalCIRP, corporate law, insolvency and bankruptcy code, legalLeave a comment

IBC law

Corporate Law, Legal Update, NI Act

Demand Notice via emails or WhatsApp, valid under section 138 NI Act, 1881- Allahabad HC

February 14, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, Section 138 NI ActLeave a comment

NI Act

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update, Service Tax

DEMAND MERELY ON BASIS OF FORM 26AS, NOT SUSTAINABLE

February 13, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, income tax, indirect tax, serivce taxLeave a comment

Demand on basis of Form 26AS not sustainable

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update

MERE CHANGE OF OPINION BY AO, NO GROUND FOR RE-OPENING ASSESSMENT PROCEEDING

February 9, 2024majestylegal#IncomeTax, bombay high court, indirect tax, ministry of financeLeave a comment

Emkay global v Assistant Commissioner of IT

Companies Act, Corporate Law, Legal Update, Tax

NFRA proceedings stayed against CA for “professional misconduct”- Delhi High Court

January 27, 2024majestylegalChartered Accountant, NFRALeave a comment

CA Unnikrishan versus NFRA

Posts pagination

1 2 Next

Recent Posts

  • DECEPTIVE IMITATION: COURT BLOCKS ROGUE WEBSITE FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT: Delhi HC
  • SC ASKS CBIC TO RELAX GST TIMELINES FOR BONAFIED ERRORS
  • REFUND CLAIM VALID AS NOTIFICATION CANNOT BE GIVEN RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT TO DENY ITC- Madras HC
  • GST DEMAND OF FOUR YEARS CONSOLIDATED NOTICE IS IMPERMISSIBLE: Bombay HC
  • Mere intimation of arrest insufficient; grounds must be clearly communicated- Gauhati High Court
EMAIL US majestylegal9@gmail.com,mahi@majestylegal.in
PHONE : +91 9785461395

OFFICE : B-87, UDB Alaknanda Apartment, G-1,Ganesh Marg/Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015


CHAMBER : 204, E-Block Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur

© 2021 Majesty Legal All right reserved

Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes

Free Consultation