Recent Posts
- Invocation of Section 21(5) of the Act requires proof of willfull suppression- AP High Court
- DELHI HIGH COURT REAFFIRMS MAGISTRATE’S LIMITED POWER UNDER SECTION 156(3) CRPC
- SUPREME COURT STRONGLY CRITICIZES ED FOR MISUSING PMLA TO PROLONG ACCUSED’S DETENTION
- Delhi HC upholds NFRA’S Authority; quashes disciplinary actions.
- STEP FORWARD! We represented this matter wherein Hon’ble Court acknowledged critical legal issues: whether demand can stand without a defined methodology under the Excise Act and whether penalty under Rule 26(1) was justified. Further scheduled for final hearing