Skip to content
Majesty Legal
  • Home
  • Blog & Articles
  • Practice Area
    • Taxation Law – Direct & Indirect
    • Economic Offences/Anti-Money Laundering Law
    • Corporate, Insolvency, Competition/Anti-trust and Security Law
    • Commercial/Contractual Law & Mining Law
    • Service Law and Labour Law
    • Alternative Dispute Redressal (ADR) – Arbitration, Mediation, and Conciliation
    • Consumer, Insurance and Motor Vehicle Accident Claim (MACT) Law
    • Criminal Law
    • Matrimonial, Family and Inheritance Law
    • Pro Bono and Social Cause
    • Land, Revenue, and Real Estate Law
  • About
  • Contact

Tag: corporate law

  • Home
  • Blog
  • corporate law
Corporate Law, Legal Update, NI Act

Pre-mature complaint under section 138 NI Act, 1881 is not maintainable- Karnataka HC

March 20, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, legal update, Negotiable InstrumentsLeave a comment

Section 138 NI Act, 1881

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update

REASSESSMENT NOTICES UNDER THE OLD REGIME, ARE TIME-BARRED- Cal HC

February 19, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, income tax, indirect tax, legal update, reassessmentLeave a comment

reaasessment notices under old regime

Corporate Law, IBC, Legal Update

CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED IF NOT SUBMITTED UNDER THE PRESCRIBED FORM – SC

February 15, 2024majestylegalCIRP, corporate law, insolvency and bankruptcy code, legalLeave a comment

IBC law

Corporate Law, Legal Update, NI Act

Demand Notice via emails or WhatsApp, valid under section 138 NI Act, 1881- Allahabad HC

February 14, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, Section 138 NI ActLeave a comment

NI Act

Corporate Law, Income Tax, Indirect Tax, Legal Update, Service Tax

DEMAND MERELY ON BASIS OF FORM 26AS, NOT SUSTAINABLE

February 13, 2024majestylegalcorporate law, income tax, indirect tax, serivce taxLeave a comment

Demand on basis of Form 26AS not sustainable

Recent Posts

  • AO CANNOT REEXAMINE NET PROFIT BEYOND SCOPE OF SECTION 115J: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
  • CASH CREDIT ACCOUNT NOT ‘PROPERTY’ FOR ATTACHMENT UNDER SECTION 83: BOMBAY HC
  • FOREIGN NATIONAL CANNOT BE RESTRICTED FOR INDIFINITE PERIOD BY ISSUING LOC EVEN WHEN NOT NAMED AS ACCUSED- Madras HC
  • ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT HOLDS ANTICIPATORY BAIL MAINTAINABLE UNDER BNSS EVEN IN NDPS CASES
  • ARBITRATION APPLICATION ALLOWED DESPITE ABSENCE OF SECTION 21 NOTICE- Rajasthan HC
EMAIL US majestylegal9@gmail.com,mahi@majestylegal.in
PHONE : +91 9785461395

OFFICE : B-87, UDB Alaknanda Apartment, G-1,Ganesh Marg/Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur-302015


CHAMBER : 204, E-Block Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur

© 2021 Majesty Legal All right reserved

Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes

Free Consultation